The investigation into the anomalous and graft-laden flood control projects in the country has turned into a battle among the people involved in the probe, with those in the two Houses of Congress using social media to destroy each other’s credibility. Some probers aim to uncover the truth and hold those accountable for corruption, while others are protecting the interests of those suspected of corruption. The Senate Blue Ribbon Committee has seen changes in leadership, with former chair Sen. Rodante Marcoleta being ousted and later accused of bias towards the controversial contractor Discaya couple. Marcoleta’s fellow investigators highlighted his recommendation to consider the Discayas as state witnesses, which was refused by Senate President Tito Sotto. Sotto was then accused of bias towards House Speaker Martin Romualdez, who has members named in the corruption scandal. The probe has become muddled, with issues of bias and corruption among the investigators themselves. It is unclear how the investigation will contribute to the crafting of responsive legislation to stop corruption in government transactions. Perhaps the best course of action is to ensure the Independent Commission for Infrastructure’s investigation leads to prosecution and conviction of those accused, with the courts limiting legal remedies to prevent delays in implementing sentences.
